"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
04/10/2015 at 12:33 • Filed to: None | 0
| 10 |
On one hand, it's really great for being a !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! r. On the other hand, I prefer the SUVs we've been looking at. I think in this case, I might even prefer a comprable 5-series wagon.
The advantage of a car this cheap is it would leave us with some cash to get the Alfa back on the road, which has been set as a project for this summer.
Party-vi
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/10/2015 at 12:36 |
|
YES BUT DID YOU ALSO CONSIDER THE OTHER PROBLEM WHERE IS THE V10???
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Party-vi
04/10/2015 at 12:37 |
|
Did they sell a V10 S6 avant in the US?
Party-vi
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/10/2015 at 12:39 |
|
All other 6 variants do not exist to me unless they have a V10.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Party-vi
04/10/2015 at 12:40 |
|
Well then I guess you won't be buying this one :)
Party-vi
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
04/10/2015 at 12:42 |
|
I won't be buying any other car in the near(ish) future sadly.
The World of Vee
> Party-vi
04/10/2015 at 12:57 |
|
The 3.0T in the newer C6s were actually pretty on par with the 5.2 and with a mild tune will smoke the V10.
But the V10 is a V10 so there's that.
Party-vi
> The World of Vee
04/10/2015 at 13:07 |
|
Yes you are correct but it is missing the most important part which is 10 cylinders.
The World of Vee
> Party-vi
04/10/2015 at 13:18 |
|
But the V10 is a V10 so there's that.
I'm on it, chief :)
But what the 3.0 lacks in V10 it makes up for in potential Avant.
Party-vi
> The World of Vee
04/10/2015 at 13:23 |
|
Incorrect there is no replacement for displacement.
*chief, out.*
The World of Vee
> Party-vi
04/10/2015 at 16:05 |
|
Haha I used to be 100% in that camp. Until I started added turbos to my Audis. Now NA doesn't do it for me at all :(
I'VE BECOME JADED HELP